Verified before
you submit.
Drop a submission package. SAFE reads every page against your customer's own quality manual and returns a cited verdict in minutes, with every finding backed by the exact clause it breaks.
One card. One decision.
Drop a file, a folder, a ZIP, or a link. SAFE classifies every document, maps it to its PPAP slot, infers the submission level from your customer's decision matrix, and asks you to confirm the one call that needs a human.
A fleet of specialists, not a single pass.
SAFE deploys one validator per deliverable (PFMEA, Control Plan, Cpk, MSA, IMDS, and on down), each an expert in one slice. Directors reconcile them. You watch every agent's status and confidence as it works.
SAFE never asserts. It cites.
Click a finding. The screen splits: the supplier's exact text on the left, the verbatim clause from your quality manual it breaks on the right. No black box. You audit every conclusion in seconds.
"Cpk = 1.42 on the Ø12 H7 bore."
MSA / Gage R&R, D-05 §2:
"%GRR = 28%."
"For a Critical Characteristic, Cpk shall be ≥ 1.67 long-term and ≥ 2.0 preliminary. Gage R&R shall be < 10%."
The expensive rejections live between documents.
Each document looks fine alone. SAFE runs the cross-checks no single-document review can: it traces a characteristic across the whole package and shows you exactly where it snaps.
A dialogue, not a static PDF.
Open any finding and work it through with the validator that raised it. Accept it, ask it to explain, patch the issue in place, or concede the point. The supporting clause sits right there in the conversation.
Same evidence. Two audiences. On demand.
When the verdict lands, SAFE writes two reports side by side: one for your quality team, one for the supplier. Reframe for the reader and switch language without retyping a word.
Conditional reject. 2 Critical
- CH-01: capability fails and the gauge is not capable
- CH-01: severity downgraded between drawing and PFMEA
- Rev C inspection evidence against a Rev D release
3 items to close before resubmission
- Re-run Gage R&R on a calibrated CMM, %GRR < 10%
- Restore CH-01 to Critical across PFMEA and Control Plan
- Re-inspect against Rev D or attach a deviation
What it costs you today, and with SAFE.
For any supplier running more than a handful of submissions a month, the labour case alone pays for SAFE inside a quarter. Every point of first-pass approval is a week of cycle time you stop burning.
| 1 to 2 weeks per submission | → | Minutes |
| 40 to 80 senior-SQE hours | → | A fleet, in parallel |
| About half come back on the documents | → | A cited verdict before you submit |
| One human signature | → | A replayable audit chain |
Replay it. Do not reconstruct it.
Every agent action, every piece of evidence, every rule break, every verdict is recorded as a typed event stream. When the part-history review lands a decade later, you do not rely on a signature. You replay the decision.
Read every page so your people do not have to.
SAFE runs today on automotive PPAP and VDA. Drop a package and see the cited verdict for yourself.
SAFE is the submission-validation surface of the Gottlieb Manufactory, live on automotive PPAP and VDA today. Figures are illustrative of the design-partner profile; first-pass targets are targets, not measured averages. The interactions on this page run on canned demo data.