The Hidden Friction: What Automotive Engineers Say Stops Innovation
We analyzed specialists across 16 disciplines to pinpoint the tasks that consume 20-40% of their most valuable time. Innovation often fails due to manual routine.
Media contact
For press inquiries and media requests press@gottlieb.ai
For decades, the automotive industry has pushed the boundaries of innovation, but what does the day - to - day reality look like for the engineers on the front lines ? We analyzed interviews with specialists across 16 different engineering disciplines — from Vehicle Dynamics to Crash Safety and Manufacturing — to pinpoint the tasks that consume their most valuable time and the frustrations that slow down development.The data reveals a stark truth: a significant portion of engineering time is lost not to breakthrough design, but to non - value - add, repetitive tasks that are ripe for automation.
The Time - Sinks: 20 - 40 % of a Week, Lost
When asked about the tasks that consume 20 - 40 % of their time, engineers consistently pointed to manual data preparation and validation.This includes:
Chassis / Suspension Engineer: Load Case Definition and Input for MBD simulations, which requires manually cross - referencing data to define exact simulation conditions.
Metrology Engineer: Manual Generation of Inspection Plans from 2D Drawings, translating complex GD & T callouts into step - by - step routines for the CMM.
Product Release Engineer: Formalizing the Bill of Materials(BOM) Release, manually verifying and populating data fields in the PLM system.
Test and Validation Engineer: Writing the Final Test Report, synthesizing raw data and manually ensuring compliance with internal templates.
The Single Biggest Frustration: The "One-Thing-To-Solve"
If engineers could solve only one frustration to dramatically improve their lives, the answers highlight critical bottlenecks in the simulation and manufacturing process:
VAC / Thermal Management Engineer: Accurate Prediction of Real - World Soaking and Cabin Cool - Down, a highly variable and difficult - to - pinpoint aspect of thermal performance.
CAE Analyst: Automatic Mesh Generation and Cleanup, which can take 50 % of their time before any simulation can run.
Tooling and Fixture Engineer: Rapid Feasibility Analysis of Part Geometry for Tooling, to instantly flag designs that are prohibitively expensive or impossible to manufacture.
Interior / Trim Engineer: Tolerance Stack - Up Analysis Directly on Complex Assemblies to quickly check cumulative tolerance issues.
High Stakes, High Risk: Where AI Must Not Fail
Engineers are clear about the safety - critical areas where a mistake has immediate and severe consequences, and where they would not trust an AI assistant without human oversight:
Crash Safety Engineer: Airbag Deployment Timing and Sensor Calibration.
Packaging Engineer: High - Voltage(HV) Cable Routing and Component Clearance, as a clash creates a risk of fire or catastrophic assembly delay.
Supplier Quality Engineer(SQE): Final Sign - off on the Production Part Approval Process(PPAP), as a mistake here means bad parts ship for the life of the program, leading to recalls.
The Key to Adoption: Seamless Integration
A recurring theme for AI and new tool adoption is the absolute necessity of seamless integration into existing workflows.As the Chassis / Suspension Engineer put it, "If the AI is not a module within the MBD environment... it will be ignored." The SQE needs the AI to check supplier documents against templates *before *they even look at them, acting as a mandatory gate.Similarly, the Metrology Engineer insists, "The AI needs to speak the language of GD&T and integrate with the CMM programming environment." For engineers, a new tool is only valuable if it reduces friction in the most complex, time - consuming steps, and the cost of non - compliance and warranty claims is often seen as *far *more valuable than a small R & D time reduction.The future of automotive engineering is not just about designing better cars, but about building better tools to support the process.
